Is this still a think, or can we remove it from patchwork?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-trace-kernel/patch/169846405196.88147.17766692778800222203.stgit@devnote2/ -- Steve On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 12:34:12 +0900 "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> > > Add a test case for probing on a symbol in a module without module name. > When probing on a symbol in a module, ftrace accepts both the syntax that > <MODNAME>:<SYMBOL> and <SYMBOL>. Current test case only checks the former > syntax. This adds a test for the latter one. > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> > --- > .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc > b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc > index 7e74ee11edf9..4b32e1b9a8d3 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/kprobe_module.tc > @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ fi > MOD=trace_printk > FUNC=trace_printk_irq_work > > +:;: "Add an event on a module function without module name" ;: > + > +echo "p:event0 $FUNC" > kprobe_events > +test -d events/kprobes/event0 || exit_failure > +echo "-:kprobes/event0" >> kprobe_events > + > :;: "Add an event on a module function without specifying event name" ;: > > echo "p $MOD:$FUNC" > kprobe_events
