On Thu, 28 May 2026 16:36:33 -0400 Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2026 10:44:39 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If the get_boot_id() is accepted by the random folks, then I'm fine with > > > this change. > > > > Yeah, BTW, Sashiko found this can be initialized before we get enough > > entropy for random seed. Maybe we need one more delay. > > Well, maybe for adding the boot_id later, but the code that initializes the > buffers needs to stay early. With the backup instance, the persistent ring > buffer can restart tracing immediately. Agreed, so the buffer will be made in early stage without initializing the boot_id field, and it will be updated when user reads the boot_id from kernel. Anyway, without reading boot_id from user space, it is meaningless. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
