On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 10:00:17PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>On 5/31/26 11:39, Lance Yang wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 09:00:01AM -0600, Nico Pache wrote:
>>> Pass an order and offset to collapse_huge_page to support collapsing anon
>>> memory to arbitrary orders within a PMD. order indicates what mTHP size we
>>> are attempting to collapse to, and offset indicates were in the PMD to
>>> start the collapse attempt.
>>>
>>> For non-PMD collapse we must leave the anon VMA write locked until after
>>> we collapse the mTHP-- in the PMD case all the pages are isolated, but in
>>> the mTHP case this is not true, and we must keep the lock to prevent
>>> access/changes to the page tables. This can happen if the rmap walkers hit
>>> a pmd_none while the PMD entry is currently unavailable due to being
>>> temporarily removed during the collapse phase.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Usama Arif <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> index fab35d318641..d64f42f66236 100644
>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> @@ -1214,34 +1214,36 @@ static enum scan_result alloc_charge_folio(struct 
>>> folio **foliop, struct mm_stru
>>>  * while allocating a THP, as that could trigger direct reclaim/compaction.
>>>  * Note that the VMA must be rechecked after grabbing the mmap_lock again.
>>>  */
>>> -static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned 
>>> long address,
>>> -           int referenced, int unmapped, struct collapse_control *cc)
>>> +static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned 
>>> long start_addr,
>>> +           int referenced, int unmapped, struct collapse_control *cc,
>>> +           unsigned int order)
>>> {
>>> +   const unsigned long pmd_addr = start_addr & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
>>> +   const unsigned long end_addr = start_addr + (PAGE_SIZE << order);
>>>     LIST_HEAD(compound_pagelist);
>>>     pmd_t *pmd, _pmd;
>>> -   pte_t *pte;
>>> +   pte_t *pte = NULL;
>>>     pgtable_t pgtable;
>>>     struct folio *folio;
>>>     spinlock_t *pmd_ptl, *pte_ptl;
>>>     enum scan_result result = SCAN_FAIL;
>>>     struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>>>     struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>>> +   bool anon_vma_locked = false;
>>>
>>> -   VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>>> -
>>> -   result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>>> +   result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, cc, order);
>>>     if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>>>             goto out_nolock;
>>>
>>>     mmap_read_lock(mm);
>>> -   result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc,
>>> -                                    HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>>> +   result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, pmd_addr, /*expect_anon=*/ true,
>>> +                                    &vma, cc, order);
>>>     if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>>>             mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>>>             goto out_nolock;
>>>     }
>>>
>>> -   result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, address, &pmd);
>>> +   result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, pmd_addr, &pmd);
>>>     if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
>>>             mmap_read_unlock(mm);
>>>             goto out_nolock;
>>> @@ -1253,8 +1255,8 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct 
>>> mm_struct *mm, unsigned long a
>>>              * released when it fails. So we jump out_nolock directly in
>>>              * that case.  Continuing to collapse causes inconsistency.
>>>              */
>>> -           result = __collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, vma, address, pmd,
>>> -                                                referenced, 
>>> HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>>> +           result = __collapse_huge_page_swapin(mm, vma, start_addr, pmd,
>>> +                                                referenced, order);
>>>             if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>>>                     goto out_nolock;
>>>     }
>>> @@ -1269,20 +1271,21 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct 
>>> mm_struct *mm, unsigned long a
>>>      * mmap_lock.
>>>      */
>>>     mmap_write_lock(mm);
>>> -   result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc,
>>> -                                    HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
>>> +   result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, pmd_addr, /*expect_anon=*/ true,
>>> +                                    &vma, cc, order);
>>>     if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>>>             goto out_up_write;
>>>     /* check if the pmd is still valid */
>>>     vma_start_write(vma);
>>> -   result = check_pmd_still_valid(mm, address, pmd);
>>> +   result = check_pmd_still_valid(mm, pmd_addr, pmd);
>>>     if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
>>>             goto out_up_write;
>>>
>>>     anon_vma_lock_write(vma->anon_vma);
>>> +   anon_vma_locked = true;
>>>
>>> -   mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, mm, address,
>>> -                           address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>>> +   mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, mm, start_addr,
>>> +                           end_addr);
>>>     mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>>
>>>     pmd_ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd); /* probably unnecessary */
>>> @@ -1294,26 +1297,23 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct 
>>> mm_struct *mm, unsigned long a
>>>      * Parallel GUP-fast is fine since GUP-fast will back off when
>>>      * it detects PMD is changed.
>>>      */
>>> -   _pmd = pmdp_collapse_flush(vma, address, pmd);
>>> +   _pmd = pmdp_collapse_flush(vma, pmd_addr, pmd);
>>>     spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
>>>     mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>>>     tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
>>>
>>> -   pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, &_pmd, address, &pte_ptl);
>>> +   pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, &_pmd, start_addr, &pte_ptl);
>>>     if (pte) {
>>> -           result = __collapse_huge_page_isolate(vma, address, pte, cc,
>>> -                                                 HPAGE_PMD_ORDER,
>>> -                                                 &compound_pagelist);
>>> +           result = __collapse_huge_page_isolate(vma, start_addr, pte, cc,
>>> +                                                 order, 
>>> &compound_pagelist);
>>>             spin_unlock(pte_ptl);
>>>     } else {
>>>             result = SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE;
>>>     }
>>>
>>>     if (unlikely(result != SCAN_SUCCEED)) {
>>> -           if (pte)
>>> -                   pte_unmap(pte);
>>>             spin_lock(pmd_ptl);
>>> -           BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*pmd));
>>> +           WARN_ON_ONCE(!pmd_none(*pmd));
>>>             /*
>>>              * We can only use set_pmd_at when establishing
>>>              * hugepmds and never for establishing regular pmds that
>>> @@ -1321,21 +1321,24 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct 
>>> mm_struct *mm, unsigned long a
>>>              */
>>>             pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pmd_pgtable(_pmd));
>>>             spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
>>> -           anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma);
>>>             goto out_up_write;
>>>     }
>>>
>>>     /*
>>> -    * All pages are isolated and locked so anon_vma rmap
>>> -    * can't run anymore.
>>> +    * For PMD collapse all pages are isolated and locked so anon_vma
>>> +    * rmap can't run anymore. For mTHP collapse the PMD entry has been
>>> +    * removed and not all pages are isolated and locked, so we must hold
>>> +    * the lock to prevent neighboring folios from attempting to access
>>> +    * this PMD until its reinstalled.
>>>      */
>>> -   anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma);
>>> +   if (is_pmd_order(order)) {
>>> +           anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma);
>>> +           anon_vma_locked = false;
>>> +   }
>>>
>>>     result = __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte, folio, pmd, _pmd,
>>> -                                      vma, address, pte_ptl,
>>> -                                      HPAGE_PMD_ORDER,
>>> -                                      &compound_pagelist);
>>> -   pte_unmap(pte);
>>> +                                      vma, start_addr, pte_ptl,
>>> +                                      order, &compound_pagelist);
>>>     if (unlikely(result != SCAN_SUCCEED))
>>>             goto out_up_write;
>>>
>>> @@ -1345,18 +1348,32 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct 
>>> mm_struct *mm, unsigned long a
>>>      * write.
>>>      */
>>>     __folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
>>> -   pgtable = pmd_pgtable(_pmd);
>>> -
>>>     spin_lock(pmd_ptl);
>>> -   BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*pmd));
>>> -   pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>>> -   map_anon_folio_pmd_nopf(folio, pmd, vma, address);
>>> +   WARN_ON_ONCE(!pmd_none(*pmd));
>>> +   if (is_pmd_order(order)) {
>>> +           pgtable = pmd_pgtable(_pmd);
>>> +           pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>>> +           map_anon_folio_pmd_nopf(folio, pmd, vma, pmd_addr);
>>> +   } else {
>>> +           /*
>>> +            * set_ptes is called in map_anon_folio_pte_nopf with the
>>> +            * pmd_ptl lock still held; this is safe as the PMD is expected
>>> +            * to be none. The pmd entry is then repopulated below.
>>> +            */
>>> +           map_anon_folio_pte_nopf(folio, pte, vma, start_addr, 
>>> /*uffd_wp=*/ false);
>> 
>> Emm ... is it safe to use map_anon_folio_pte_nopf() here?
>> 
>> At this point pmdp_collapse_flush() has cleared the PMD from the page
>> tables. The PTE table we are updating is only reachable through the saved
>> old PMD value, _pmd, until pmd_populate() below.
>> 
>> map_anon_folio_pte_nopf() does set_ptes() and then calls
>> update_mmu_cache_range(). Documentation/core-api/cachetlb.rst describes
>> that hook as:
>> 
>> "
>>      At the end of every page fault, this routine is invoked to tell
>>      the architecture specific code that translations now exists
>>      in the software page tables for address space "vma->vm_mm"
>>      at virtual address "address" for "nr" consecutive pages.
>> "
>> 
>> But that does not seem true here yet, since the PTE table is not
>> reachable from vma->vm_mm when update_mmu_cache_range() is called.
>> 
>> Should we avoid calling update_mmu_cache_range() until after the PTE
>> table is reinstalled with pmd_populate()?
>
>I recall that update_mmu_cache* users mostly care about updating folios flags,
>for the folio derived from the PTE ... or flushing caches for the user address.
>
>So intuitively I would say "the architecture code doesn't care that the PMD
>table will only be visible to HW shortly after". The important thing should be
>that it will definetly happen, and that nothing else is curently there or can 
>be
>there?

Ah, fair point.

I was mostly worried about arch hooks that walk vma->vm_mm again, rather
than only using the pte pointer passed in. For example, mips does:

  update_mmu_cache_range()
    -> __update_tlb()
      -> pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, address)
      -> pte_offset_map(...)

and __update_tlb() has this assumption:

                /*
                 * update_mmu_cache() is called between pte_offset_map_lock()
                 * and pte_unmap_unlock(), so we can assume that ptep is not
                 * NULL here: and what should be done below if it were NULL?
                 */

So if khugepaged happens to run with current->active_mm == vma->vm_mm
here, could __update_tlb() hit the none PMD, get NULL from
pte_offset_map(), and then dereference it?

Just wanted to raise it since some arch code may still have assumptions
like this, and the always-enable-mTHP work is getting closer ...

Probably very very very hard to hit, though :)

Cheers, Lance

Reply via email to