On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 1:41 AM Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:34:32 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Your series will heavily conflict with Simon's one > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=1063486&state=%2A&archive=both > > > > I suggest you rebase/retest/resend after we merge it. > > Would it make sense to extend netdevsim and packetdrill to be able to > exercise scaling ratio a little more? Having it optionally clone the > skb and truesize += X would be trivial. IDK how many bugs this would > let us catch tho :(
Yes, I think we mentioned this at some point. packetdrill uses tun device. Adding a TUN ioctl() to control how many additional bytes are added to skb->truesize after tun allocates an skb is doable.
