On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 13:36 +0200, Simon Schuster via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Simon Schuster <schuster.si...@siemens-energy.com>
>
> Since commit edd3cb05c00a ("copy_process: pass clone_flags as u64
> across
> calltree") the task_newtask trace event exposes clone_flags as u64 to
> its callbacks.
>
> However, ltl_monitor was not adapted, resulting in a faulty callback.
> This also resulted in an lkp build warning due to
> -Wincompatible-pointer-types.
>
Looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmon...@redhat.com>
Adding Nam (author of LTL) to the loop.
Gabriele
> Fixes: edd3cb05c00a ("copy_process: pass clone_flags as u64 across
> calltree")
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
> Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250904113334.18822...@canb.auug.org.au/
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509040134.bqvbm7ja-...@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Simon Schuster <schuster.si...@siemens-energy.com>
> ---
> I did further search for other in-tree users of the task_newtask
> callback, but the trace macros make it a bit harder. Yet, as far as I
> could see, there are none, so this patch hopefully resolves the
> problem
> for good. The other matches all relate to "tp_btf/task_newtask",
> which
> seems to be unaffected.
>
> With this patch, ARCH=S390 allmodconfig -- that originally tripped
> the
> LKP builds -- now builds without further -Wincompatible-pointer-types
> warnings.
>
> Sorry for causing this trouble, and thanks to Stephen Rothwell for
> testing/reporting.
> ---
> include/rv/ltl_monitor.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/rv/ltl_monitor.h b/include/rv/ltl_monitor.h
> index 67031a774e3d..5368cf5fd623 100644
> --- a/include/rv/ltl_monitor.h
> +++ b/include/rv/ltl_monitor.h
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void ltl_task_init(struct task_struct *task,
> bool task_creation)
> ltl_atoms_fetch(task, mon);
> }
>
> -static void handle_task_newtask(void *data, struct task_struct
> *task, unsigned long flags)
> +static void handle_task_newtask(void *data, struct task_struct
> *task, u64 flags)
> {
> ltl_task_init(task, true);
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: edd3cb05c00a040dc72bed20b14b5ba865188bce
> change-id: 20250904-trace-task-newtask-fix-callbacks-b158634c59da
>
> Best regards,
