Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
system_wq is a per-CPU worqueue, yet nothing in its name tells about that
CPU affinity constraint, which is very often not required by users. Make
it clear by adding a system_percpu_wq.
queue_work() / queue_delayed_work() mod_delayed_work() will now use the
new per-cpu wq: whether the user still stick on the old name a warn will
be printed along a wq redirect to the new one.
This patch add the new system_percpu_wq except for mm, fs and net
subsystem, whom are handled in separated patches.
The old wq will be kept for a few release cylces.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivell...@suse.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
index af42aaa3d172..3169182229ad 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ void user_event_mm_remove(struct task_struct *t)
* so we use a work queue after call_rcu() to run within.
*/
INIT_RCU_WORK(&mm->put_rwork, delayed_user_event_mm_put);
- queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &mm->put_rwork);
+ queue_rcu_work(system_percpu_wq, &mm->put_rwork);
}
void user_event_mm_dup(struct task_struct *t, struct user_event_mm *old_mm)
--
2.51.0
