From: gaoxiang17 <gaoxian...@xiaomi.com>

Sometimes, when analyzing some real-time process issues, it is necessary to 
know the sched policy.

Show up in the trace as:

      113.457176: sched_switch: prev_comm=kcompactd0 prev_pid=30 prev_prio=120 
prev_state=S ==> next_comm=kworker/u4:1 next_pid=27 next_prio=120 next_policy=0
      113.457282: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/u4:1 prev_pid=27 
prev_prio=120 prev_state=I ==> next_comm=swapper/0 next_pid=0 next_prio=120 
next_policy=0
      113.461166: sched_switch: prev_comm=swapper/0 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 
prev_state=R ==> next_comm=kworker/u4:1 next_pid=27 next_prio=120 next_policy=0

Signed-off-by: gaoxiang17 <gaoxian...@xiaomi.com>
---
 include/trace/events/sched.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h
index 7b2645b50e78..b416b7bafee4 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
                __array(        char,   next_comm,      TASK_COMM_LEN   )
                __field(        pid_t,  next_pid                        )
                __field(        int,    next_prio                       )
+               __field(        unsigned int,   next_policy     )
        ),
 
        TP_fast_assign(
@@ -244,10 +245,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
                memcpy(__entry->next_comm, next->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
                __entry->next_pid       = next->pid;
                __entry->next_prio      = next->prio;
+               __entry->next_policy    = next->policy;
                /* XXX SCHED_DEADLINE */
        ),
 
-       TP_printk("prev_comm=%s prev_pid=%d prev_prio=%d prev_state=%s%s ==> 
next_comm=%s next_pid=%d next_prio=%d",
+       TP_printk("prev_comm=%s prev_pid=%d prev_prio=%d prev_state=%s%s ==> 
next_comm=%s next_pid=%d next_prio=%d next_policy=%u",
                __entry->prev_comm, __entry->prev_pid, __entry->prev_prio,
 
                (__entry->prev_state & (TASK_REPORT_MAX - 1)) ?
@@ -263,7 +265,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
                  "R",
 
                __entry->prev_state & TASK_REPORT_MAX ? "+" : "",
-               __entry->next_comm, __entry->next_pid, __entry->next_prio)
+               __entry->next_comm, __entry->next_pid, __entry->next_prio, 
__entry->next_policy)
 );
 
 /*
-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to