Show uprobe_multi link info with fdinfo, the info as follows:

link_type:      uprobe_multi
link_id:        9
prog_tag:       e729f789e34a8eca
prog_id:        39
type:   uprobe_multi
uprobe_cnt:     3
pid:    0
path:   /home/dylane/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs
offset           ref_ctr_offset   cookie
0xa69f13         0x0              3
0xa69f1e         0x0              1
0xa69f29         0x0              2

Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)

Change list:
  v3 -> v4:
    - use %pS to print func info.(Alexei)
  v3:
  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

  v2 -> v3:
    - show info in one line for multi events.(Jiri)
  v2:
  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] 

  v1 -> v2:
    - replace 'func_cnt' with 'uprobe_cnt'.(Andrii)
    - print func name is more readable and security for kprobe_multi.(Alexei)
  v1:
  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 24b94870b50..2d422f897ac 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3157,10 +3157,57 @@ static int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_fill_link_info(const 
struct bpf_link *link,
        return err;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+static void bpf_uprobe_multi_show_fdinfo(const struct bpf_link *link,
+                                        struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+       struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link *umulti_link;
+       char *p, *buf;
+
+       umulti_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link, link);
+
+       buf = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!buf)
+               return;
+
+       p = d_path(&umulti_link->path, buf, PATH_MAX);
+       if (IS_ERR(p)) {
+               kfree(buf);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       seq_printf(seq,
+                  "type:\t%s\n"
+                  "uprobe_cnt:\t%u\n"
+                  "pid:\t%u\n"
+                  "path:\t%s\n",
+                  umulti_link->flags == BPF_F_UPROBE_MULTI_RETURN ?
+                                        "uretprobe_multi" : "uprobe_multi",
+                  umulti_link->cnt,
+                  umulti_link->task ? task_pid_nr_ns(umulti_link->task,
+                          task_active_pid_ns(current)) : 0,
+                  p);
+
+       seq_printf(seq, "%-16s %-16s %-16s\n", "offset", "ref_ctr_offset", 
"cookie");
+       for (int i = 0; i < umulti_link->cnt; i++) {
+               seq_printf(seq,
+                          "%#-16llx %#-16lx %-16llu\n",
+                          umulti_link->uprobes[i].offset,
+                          umulti_link->uprobes[i].ref_ctr_offset,
+                          umulti_link->uprobes[i].cookie);
+       }
+
+       kfree(buf);
+}
+#endif
+
 static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_uprobe_multi_link_lops = {
        .release = bpf_uprobe_multi_link_release,
        .dealloc_deferred = bpf_uprobe_multi_link_dealloc,
        .fill_link_info = bpf_uprobe_multi_link_fill_link_info,
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+       .show_fdinfo = bpf_uprobe_multi_show_fdinfo,
+#endif
 };
 
 static int uprobe_prog_run(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe,
-- 
2.48.1


Reply via email to