On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:56:23AM +0100, joel granados wrote:
> Move s390 sysctls (spin_retry and userprocess_debug) into their own
> files under arch/s390. We create two new sysctl tables
> (2390_{fault,spin}_sysctl_table) which will be initialized with
> arch_initcall placing them after their original place in proc_root_init.
> 
> This is part of a greater effort to move ctl tables into their
> respective subsystems which will reduce the merge conflicts in
> kerenel/sysctl.c.
  ^^^^^^^
typo

> diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c b/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c
> index a81a01c44927..4483fdc9d472 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/lib/spinlock.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@
>  #include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/asm.h>
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +#include <linux/sysctl.h>
> +#endif
> +
...
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +static const struct ctl_table s390_spin_sysctl_table[] = {
> +     {
> +             .procname       = "spin_retry",
> +             .data           = &spin_retry,
> +             .maxlen         = sizeof(int),
> +             .mode           = 0644,
> +             .proc_handler   = proc_dointvec,
> +     },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init init_s390_spin_sysctls(void)
> +{
> +     register_sysctl_init("kernel", s390_spin_sysctl_table);
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(init_s390_spin_sysctls);
> +#endif

I see that you want to keep the existing CONFIG_SMP behaviour, but since a
long time s390 enforces CONFIG_SMP=y (this was obviously never reflected in
kernel/sysctl.c).
Therefore the above ifdefs should be removed, and in addition the include
statement should be added to the other linux includes at the top of the file.

Reply via email to