> On Feb 4, 2025, at 5:44 PM, Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sanga...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 1, 2025, at 10:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:47:32AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On February 1, 2025 6:59:06 AM EST, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I still have full hate for this approach.
>>>
>>> So what approach would you prefer?
>>
>> The one that does not rely on the preemption method -- I think I posted
>> something along those line, and someone else recently reposted something
>> bsaed on it.
>
> Here is the RFC I had sent that Peter is referring
FWIW, I second the idea of a new syscall for this than (ab)using rseq
and also independence from preemption method. I agree that something
generic is better than relying on preemption method.
thanks,
- Joel
> Tying things to the preemption method is absurdly bad design -- and I've
>> told you that before.
>>
>
