On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:22AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
[..]
> Moving bpf_base_func_proto() all the way to the top was incorrect,
> but here we can move it just above this bpf_token_capable() check
> and remove extra indent like:
> 
> func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto();
> if (func_proto)
>    return func_proto;
> if (!bpf_token_capable(prog->aux->token, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>    return NULL;
> switch (func_id) {
> case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user:
> 
> that will align it with the style of bpf_base_func_proto().
> 
> pw-bot: cr

Ack, let me change that.

Below is preview of v4 for this bit.

@@ -1417,6 +1409,8 @@ late_initcall(bpf_key_sig_kfuncs_init);
 static const struct bpf_func_proto *
 bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
+       const struct bpf_func_proto *func_proto;
+
        switch (func_id) {
        case BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem:
                return &bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto;
@@ -1458,9 +1452,6 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const 
struct bpf_prog *prog)
                return &bpf_perf_event_read_proto;
        case BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32:
                return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto;
-       case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user:
-               return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER) < 0 ?
-                      NULL : bpf_get_probe_write_proto();
        case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user:
                return &bpf_probe_read_user_proto;
        case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel:
@@ -1539,7 +1530,22 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const 
struct bpf_prog *prog)
        case BPF_FUNC_trace_vprintk:
                return bpf_get_trace_vprintk_proto();
        default:
-               return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
+               break;
+       }
+
+       func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
+       if (func_proto)
+               return func_proto;
+
+       if (!bpf_token_capable(prog->aux->token, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+               return NULL;
+
+       switch (func_id) {
+       case BPF_FUNC_probe_write_user:
+               return security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_WRITE_USER) < 0 ?
+                      NULL : &bpf_probe_write_user_proto;
+       default:
+               return NULL;
        }
 }
 

Reply via email to