On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 14:26 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> The local variable 'sg' should be initialized in the failure path of
> mvumi_make_sgl(), otherwise the following build warning is triggered:
> 
>       In file included from include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h:8,
>                        from include/linux/pci.h:2408,
>                        from drivers/scsi/mvumi.c:13:
>       drivers/scsi/mvumi.c: In function 'mvumi_queue_command':
>       include/linux/dma-mapping.h:608:34: warning: 'sg' may be used
> uninitialized in this function
>       +[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>        #define dma_unmap_sg(d, s, n, r) dma_unmap_sg_attrs(d, s, n,
> r, 0)
>                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       drivers/scsi/mvumi.c:192:22: note: 'sg' was declared here
>         struct scatterlist *sg;
>                       ^~
> Fixed it by removing the local variable reference in failure path.
> 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
> Cc: Ewan D. Milne <emi...@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 350d66a72adc ("scsi: mvumi: use sg helper to iterate over
> scatterlist")
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming....@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/mvumi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvumi.c b/drivers/scsi/mvumi.c
> index 0022cd31500a..53f3563aca22 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mvumi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvumi.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int mvumi_make_sgl(struct mvumi_hba *mhba,
> struct scsi_cmnd *scmd,
>               dev_err(&mhba->pdev->dev,
>                       "sg count[0x%x] is bigger than max
> sg[0x%x].\n",
>                       *sg_count, mhba->max_sge);
> -             dma_unmap_sg(&mhba->pdev->dev, sg, sgnum,
> +             dma_unmap_sg(&mhba->pdev->dev, scsi_sglist(scmd),
> sgnum,
>                            scmd->sc_data_direction);
>               return -1;
>       }

I think this is a serious enough problem for mvumi that it needs
folding with comment into the original path.  I believe it will cause
an oops when this code path is hit otherwise, right?

James

Reply via email to