Hi Finn,

Am 13.10.2018 um 13:51 schrieb Finn Thain:
Avoid function calls in the inner PIO loops. On a Centris 660av this
improves throughput for sequential read transfers by about 40% and
sequential write by about 10%.

Unfortunately it is not possible to have method calls like esp_write8()
placed inline so this is always going to be slow (even with LTO).

Tested-by: Stan Johnson <user...@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fth...@telegraphics.com.au>
---
 drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
index 646701fc22a4..9f0e68cd0e99 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c
@@ -2788,7 +2788,7 @@ static inline unsigned int esp_wait_for_fifo(struct esp 
*esp)
                if (fbytes)
                        return fbytes;

-               udelay(2);
+               udelay(1);
        } while (--i);

        pr_err("FIFO is empty (sreg %02x)\n", esp_read8(ESP_STATUS));
@@ -2804,7 +2804,7 @@ static inline int esp_wait_for_intr(struct esp *esp)
                if (esp->sreg & ESP_STAT_INTR)
                        return 0;

-               udelay(2);
+               udelay(1);
        } while (--i);

        pr_err("IRQ timeout (sreg %02x)\n", esp->sreg);
@@ -2831,7 +2831,7 @@ void esp_send_pio_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, u32 
esp_count,
                        if (!esp_wait_for_fifo(esp))
                                break;

-                       *dst++ = esp_read8(ESP_FDATA);
+                       *dst++ = readb(esp->fifo_reg);
                        --esp_count;

                        if (!esp_count)
@@ -2852,15 +2852,15 @@ void esp_send_pio_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, u32 
esp_count,
                        }

                        if (phase == ESP_MIP)
-                               scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_MOK);
+                               esp_write8(ESP_CMD_MOK, ESP_CMD);

You're no longer logging this command with this patch. (That'll be the reason for the speedup you saw ...)


-                       scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_TI);
+                       esp_write8(ESP_CMD_TI, ESP_CMD);

Same here..

                }
        } else {
                unsigned int n = ESP_FIFO_SIZE;
                u8 *src = (u8 *)addr;

-               scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_FLUSH);
+               esp_write8(ESP_CMD_FLUSH, ESP_CMD);

here..


                if (n > esp_count)
                        n = esp_count;
@@ -2894,7 +2894,7 @@ void esp_send_pio_cmd(struct esp *esp, u32 addr, u32 
esp_count,
                        src += n;
                        esp_count -= n;

-                       scsi_esp_cmd(esp, ESP_CMD_TI);
+                       esp_write8(ESP_CMD_TI, ESP_CMD);

and here.

The burst of ESP_CMD_TI's in the log was quite useful to spot what went wrong during PIO. Maybe mention in the changelog that commands during PIO are no longer logged? Or introduce a new ESP_EVENT_PIO and log that at the start of PIO?

Cheers,

        Michael



                }
        }


Reply via email to