On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 19:00 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote: > I tend to agree that it's dangerous, but chose to stay somewhat > consistent with the other t10_wwn strings that are treated as though > they may not be NULL terminated. > > If you're in favour adding an extra terminator byte here, then I think > it'd make sense to do the same for model[], revision[] and unit_serial[] > too. Are you okay with that approach?
Sure, I would welcome that change. Thanks, Bart.
