Hi Anderson, Could you please check about below thread?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6357751/ Your patch is same as my old one. On 11/30/17, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org> wrote: > Occasionally the following error message can be seen in the logs of > Qualcomm devices using UFS: > > EXT4-fs (sda9): Delayed block allocation failed for inode 685600 at logical > offset 1086 with max blocks 3 with error 121 > EXT4-fs (sda9): This should not happen!! Data will be lost > > This is caused by a failing WRITE_SAME command, which per the JEDEC UFS > specification is not a supported. Set the no_write_same flag on the > ufshcd SCSI host to let the SCSI layer know this. > > Fixes: 7a3e97b0dc4b ("[SCSI] ufshcd: UFS Host controller driver") > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index 88c086f5c4e3..e5b1efd1dafd 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -6515,6 +6515,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template > ufshcd_driver_template = { > .can_queue = UFSHCD_CAN_QUEUE, > .max_host_blocked = 1, > .track_queue_depth = 1, > + .no_write_same = 1, > }; > > static int ufshcd_config_vreg_load(struct device *dev, struct ufs_vreg > *vreg, > -- > 2.15.0 > > WBR, Kyuho Choi
