The internal cfg flag is actually smaller, by 1 (for a partial page sge),
than the sg list maintained by the driver. Thus the check on sg segments
errored out when it shouldn't have

Ensure the check is +1

Note: having a value that is less than what it really is is bogus.
 Correcting it now would be a significant rework. Add this item to the
 list to be refactored in the merge with efct.

Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kenn...@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.sm...@broadcom.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
index 040af28073bb..05ab731c408a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c
@@ -1149,12 +1149,12 @@ lpfc_nvme_prep_io_dma(struct lpfc_vport *vport,
 
                first_data_sgl = sgl;
                lpfc_ncmd->seg_cnt = nCmd->sg_cnt;
-               if (lpfc_ncmd->seg_cnt > phba->cfg_nvme_seg_cnt) {
+               if (lpfc_ncmd->seg_cnt > phba->cfg_nvme_seg_cnt + 1) {
                        lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_NVME_IOERR,
                                        "6058 Too many sg segments from "
                                        "NVME Transport.  Max %d, "
                                        "nvmeIO sg_cnt %d\n",
-                                       phba->cfg_nvme_seg_cnt,
+                                       phba->cfg_nvme_seg_cnt + 1,
                                        lpfc_ncmd->seg_cnt);
                        lpfc_ncmd->seg_cnt = 0;
                        return 1;
-- 
2.13.1

Reply via email to