On 06/28/2017 10:32 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
When issuing a host reset we should be waiting for all
ports to become unblocked; just waiting for one might
be resulting in host reset to return too early.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
index 0678cf7..3d18659 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_scsi.c
@@ -311,13 +311,32 @@ static int zfcp_scsi_eh_target_reset_handler(struct
scsi_cmnd *scpnt)
static int zfcp_scsi_eh_host_reset_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *scpnt)
{
- struct zfcp_scsi_dev *zfcp_sdev = sdev_to_zfcp(scpnt->device);
- struct zfcp_adapter *adapter = zfcp_sdev->port->adapter;
- int ret;
+ struct Scsi_Host *host = scpnt->device->host;
+ struct zfcp_adapter *adapter = (struct zfcp_adapter *)host->hostdata[0];
Oh, only realized when reading the later "[PATCH 14/47] scsi: Use
Scsi_Host as argument for eh_host_reset_handler" that this part already
anticipates parts of that later patch. Seems not fully topically
separated patches to me, if this one is only about the fc_block_scsi_eh
aspect in zfcp_scsi_eh_host_reset_handler().
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier
Linux on z Systems Development
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
