Hi Nic,
On 2/7/17, 8:13 PM, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <n...@linux-iscsi.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:40 -0800, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
>> From: Quinn Tran <quinn.t...@cavium.com>
>>
>> Add routines to support T10 DIF tag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Quinn Tran <quinn.t...@cavium.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumur...@cavium.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madh...@cavium.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h | 1 +
>> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h | 17 ++
>> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c | 598
>> +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.h | 37 ++-
>> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c | 84 +++++-
>> 5 files changed, 465 insertions(+), 272 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h
>> index e1fc4e6..c6bffe9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_dbg.h
>> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ void __attribute__((format (printf, 4, 5)))
>> #define ql_dbg_tgt 0x00004000 /* Target mode */
>> #define ql_dbg_tgt_mgt 0x00002000 /* Target mode management */
>> #define ql_dbg_tgt_tmr 0x00001000 /* Target mode task management */
>> +#define ql_dbg_tgt_dif 0x00000800 /* Target mode dif */
>>
>> extern int qla27xx_dump_mpi_ram(struct qla_hw_data *, uint32_t, uint32_t *,
>> uint32_t, void **);
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
>> index 8bc1111..d6436fc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
>> @@ -2189,6 +2189,23 @@ struct qlt_plogi_ack_t {
>> void *fcport;
>> };
>>
>> +enum qla_tgt_prot_op {
>> + QLA_PROT_NORMAL = 0,
>> + QLA_PROT_DIN_INSERT,
>> + QLA_PROT_DOUT_INSERT,
>> + QLA_PROT_DIN_STRIP,
>> + QLA_PROT_DOUT_STRIP,
>> + QLA_PROT_DIN_PASS,
>> + QLA_PROT_DOUT_PASS,
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum qla_tgt_prot_type {
>> + QLA_TGT_PROT_TYPE0,
>> + QLA_TGT_PROT_TYPE1,
>> + QLA_TGT_PROT_TYPE2,
>> + QLA_TGT_PROT_TYPE3,
>> +};
>> +
>
>I don't get it, why are you duplicating target_prot_op and
>target_prot_type..?
We will fix it and resubmit this.
Thanks,
Himanshu
