On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 14:49 -0600, Bryant G. Ly wrote:
> For clients who want to utilize more than 2GB you need
> WRITE AND VERIFY 16 support.

Hello Bryant,

This patch introduces a bug for WRITE AND VERIFY(16) parsing that already
exists for WRITE AND VERIFY(10) parsing, namely that the value of the BYTCHK
field is ignored. Is it OK for you to wait a few weeks with adding WRITE AND
VERIFY(16) support and to come back to this after I have posted my WRITE AND
VERIFY(10) fix?

Bart.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to