Hi Martin,
On 12/9/16, 11:39 AM, "Madhani, Himanshu" <himanshu.madh...@cavium.com> wrote: > >On 12/9/16, 5:10 AM, "Christoph Hellwig" <h...@infradead.org> wrote: > >>Ok. We'll still need to use PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY here after it's removed >>i nthe previous patch, but with pci_irq_alloc_vectors_affinity so that >>we can get the separate non-assignment vector right as in the previous >>discussion. > >Ack. Will fix up patch and resend series. Would you be pulling changes for this new call into scsi tree anytime soon https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=irq/for-block > >Thanks, >- Himanshu > > N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{���"�{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w��� ���j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
