Hi Hannes,
On 12/7/16, 3:32 AM, "Hannes Reinecke" <[email protected]> wrote: >This is a bit odd. >If you already have code for fixing the to-do, why is the to-do there? >And if the code doesn't work, what's the point of including it here? > >I would suggest removing the code; the comment should be giving enough >of a hint of what needs to be implemented. Thanks for the review comments. This is one looks like got left off. We’ll fix this code and resubmit this series. Thanks, - Himanshu >
