I just thought that such a minor change in a comment can fit in the
same patch where the issue was first noticed. Anyway, will split them
if I am going to send a v3 set.
On 5 July 2016 at 19:08, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> On 7/5/2016 9:45 AM, tom.t...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> From: Tom Yan <tom.t...@gmail.com>
>>
>> It does not make sense and is confusing to respond with "Invalid
>> field in CDB" while we have no support at all implemented for
>> FORMAT UNIT. It is decent to let it go to the default, which
>> will respond with "Invalid command operation code" instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Yan <tom.t...@gmail.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> index 029e738..ac5676e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static void ata_scsi_set_invalid_field(struct
>> ata_device *dev,
>> struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, u16 field,
>> u8 bit)
>> {
>> ata_scsi_set_sense(dev, cmd, ILLEGAL_REQUEST, 0x24, 0x0);
>> - /* "Invalid field in cbd" */
>> + /* "Invalid field in CDB" */
>
>
> Don't do 2 things in one patch please> This change wasn't even documented
> in the patch description.
>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
