On 06/06/2016 05:40 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
On 06/06/2016 01:46 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 06/05/2016 09:32 PM, mchri...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Mike Christie <mchri...@redhat.com>
Separate the op from the rq_flag_bits and have the target layer
set/get the bio using bio_set_op_attrs/bio_op.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <mchri...@redhat.com>
---
drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
index c25109c..22af12f 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
[ .. ]
@@ -689,18 +690,15 @@ iblock_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct scatterlist
*sgl, u32 sgl_nents,
* Force writethrough using WRITE_FUA if a volatile write cache
* is not enabled, or if initiator set the Force Unit Access
bit.
*/
+ op = REQ_OP_WRITE;
if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_FUA, &q->queue_flags)) {
if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_FUA)
- rw = WRITE_FUA;
+ op_flags = WRITE_FUA;
else if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_WC, &q->queue_flags))
- rw = WRITE_FUA;
- else
- rw = WRITE;
- } else {
- rw = WRITE;
+ op_flags = WRITE_FUA;
}
Wrong intendation.
It should be ok. That line is for the QUEUE_FLAG_WC test. We end up with:
op = REQ_OP_WRITE;
if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_FUA, &q->queue_flags)) {
if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_FUA)
op_flags = WRITE_FUA;
else if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_WC, &q->queue_flags))
op_flags = WRITE_FUA;
}
Indeed, you are correct.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
