On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 14:53 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state to scsi_target_state to avoid > running > into the BUG_ON() in scsi_target_reap(). > > This intermediate state is only valid in the path from > scsi_remove_target() to > scsi_target_destroy() indicating this target is going to be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de> > Fixes: 40998193560dab6c3ce8d25f4fa58a23e252ef38
The code and ordering is fine with me, so you can add Reviewed-by: James Bottomley <j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> However, I'd really appreciate it if the description of what was going on was clearer for a non-SUSE distro maintainer. What we're doing is applying a more comprehensive fix for a previously hack fixed problem and then reverting the hack. I think message 1 should say "this refixes the problem introduced by commit X in a more comprehensive way" and message 2 "Now that we've done a more comprehensive fix with the intermediate target state in patch Y, we can remove the previous hack" James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
