On Monday 14 March 2016 16:19:58 Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba);
> > - if (vports != NULL)
> > + if (vports != NULL) {
> > for (i = 0; i <= phba->max_vports && vports[i] != NULL; i++) {
> > struct Scsi_Host *shost;
> > shost = lpfc_shost_from_vport(vports[i]);
> > @@ -2877,7 +2877,8 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
> > }
> > - lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
> > + }
> > + lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
> >
> > lpfc_unblock_mgmt_io(phba);
> > return 0;
> >
> Nope.
>
> vports is only valid from within the indentation block, so it should
> be moved into it.
>
>
Well, every other user of the function also looks like
vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba);
if (vports != NULL) {
do_something(vports);
}
lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
and lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array() does nothing if its argument is NULL.
I still think my patch is the correct fix for the warning.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
