On 02/22/2016 11:34 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 02/21/16 22:59, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> The main reason why I need the 'access_state' attribute is to decouple
>> the multipath daemon; at the moment the multipath daemon has to issue
>> REPORT TARGET PORT GROUPS frequently to figure out the status, which is
>> causing quite some load on the target. When using the 'access_state'
>> attribute we would avoid doing I/O for that and have a consistent view,
>> both on the kernel and the multipath daemon side.
>>
>> But it's actually a good thing to have the 'access_state' patch in a
>> different series; I've got some more patches converting the remaining
>> device_handler to also supply the 'access_state' values.
> 
> Hello Hannes,
> 
> The above sounds very interesting to me. Will multipathd recognize at
> run-time whether or not the kernel supports the sysfs ALUA state
> attribute ?
That was the plan.
(Not that I've got any idea _how_ to do this ATM :-)

> Will ALUA state changes be reported through udev or will
> multipathd poll the sysfs ALUA state attributes ? 
Polling. udev events will be too unreliable here, as each uevent
potentially causes I/O during uevent processing which might stall as the
path might be down.
So we might never get events for failed/transitioning paths, however,
these are precisely the cases which we're interested in ...

> And if the netlink
> buffer that is used in multipathd to receive udev events overflows
> (ENOBUFS), will multipathd resynchronize its state ? As far as I can see
> in source file libmultipath/uevent.c today multipathd ignores netlink
> buffer overflows.
> 
Which, thankfully, doesn't apply as multipathd will be polling the sysfs
attribute directly :-)

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                   zSeries & Storage
h...@suse.de                          +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to