On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 18:17 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:11:29PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > I am concerned about queuing something as a stable fix if it is > > just > > masking a fundamental underlying problem. > > It's not masking a fundamental problem. It fixes the target > state so that we can mark a starget as being under deletion > before we have to drop the list protecting the target list > iteration. Independ of any any other scanning changes it is the > right thing to do.
It introduces a bug while doing so ... that's a problem. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
