My applogies:
> It may be worth noting (if you're going to update any documentation) that
> isn't 100% accurate. You actually get one wrap in partition 1 and the rest
> minus one wrap into partition 0. There is one wrap used as a guard between
> the two partitions. The size given to a partition is rounded up to the size
> of a
> wrap as well.
>
> See
> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21419_04/en/LTO5_Vol3_E5b/LTO5_Vol3_E5b.
> pdf
>
> Page 100 where it gives examples of how partition sizes are calculated on HP
> LTO5 drives.
I should have actually said:
You do get two wraps as a minimum in partition 1 and the rest minus two wraps
into partition 0. The extra two wraps are used as a guard between the two
partitions
and all sizes will be rounded to a multiple of two wraps.
That was just to make it clear that partition sizes will always end up being a
multiple
of 2x the wrap size and that there was some fixed overhead in partitioning an
LTO5+ drive (2 wraps).
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{���"�{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w���
���j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
