On 20.1.2016 16:08, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> This removes a redundant code block that will either be executed if the
> ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING flag is set in phba->cfg_poll or not. The code is just
> duplicated in both cases, hence we unify it again.
>
> This probably is a left over from some sort of refactoring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <the...@redhat.com>
Tomas
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 17 -----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> index 152b3c8..3bd0be6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
> @@ -4139,23 +4139,6 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct
> lpfc_iocbq *pIocbIn,
> /* The sdev is not guaranteed to be valid post scsi_done upcall. */
> cmd->scsi_done(cmd);
>
> - if (phba->cfg_poll & ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING) {
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
> - lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
> -
> - /*
> - * If there is a thread waiting for command completion
> - * wake up the thread.
> - */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> - if (lpfc_cmd->waitq)
> - wake_up(lpfc_cmd->waitq);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> - lpfc_release_scsi_buf(phba, lpfc_cmd);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
> lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
