On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:09:23PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > Why do we still need TRANSPORT_LUNFLAGS_INITIATOR_ACCESS? Isn't deve > > being not-NULL enough? > > > > Yep, I think this can go as well. Dropping now.
Also might be worth to add a helper that has the ->se_lun_acl check in one place and documents why these callers want a dev_entry with a proper ACL. Also I think the ->se_lun checks should not be needed here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
