>>>>> "Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg <sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il> writes:

>>> By the commit 436f4a0a ("loopback: Add fabric_prot_type attribute
>>> support"), When WRITE_SAME command with WRPROTECT=0 is executed,
>>> sbc_dif_generate() is called but cmd->t_prot_sg is NULL as block
>>> layer didn't allocate it for WRITE_SAME.

Sagi> Actually this is a bug. Why didn't the initiator allocate
Sagi> integrity meta-data for WRITE_SAME? Looking at the code it looks
Sagi> like it should.

We don't issue WRITE SAME with PI so there is no prot SGL.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen      Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to