On 11/13/2014 02:59 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
> From: Martin Peschke <mpesc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This patch removes some leftovers for commit
> 663e0890e31cb85f0cca5ac1faaee0d2d52880b5
> "[SCSI] zfcp: remove access control tables interface".
>
> The "access denied" case for ports is gone, as well.
> The corresponding flag was cleared, but never set.
> So clean it up.
>
> Sysfs flag is kept, though, for backward-compatibility.
> Now it returns always 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke <mpesc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c | 7 -------
> drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 3 +--
> drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c | 4 +---
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
> index c82fe65..2c5d456 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c
> @@ -821,11 +821,6 @@ static int zfcp_erp_port_forced_strategy_close(struct
> zfcp_erp_action *act)
> return ZFCP_ERP_CONTINUES;
> }
>
> -static void zfcp_erp_port_strategy_clearstati(struct zfcp_port *port)
> -{
> - atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_DENIED, &port->status);
> -}
> -
> static int zfcp_erp_port_forced_strategy(struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)
> {
> struct zfcp_port *port = erp_action->port;
> @@ -833,7 +828,6 @@ static int zfcp_erp_port_forced_strategy(struct
> zfcp_erp_action *erp_action)
>
> switch (erp_action->step) {
> case ZFCP_ERP_STEP_UNINITIALIZED:
> - zfcp_erp_port_strategy_clearstati(port);
> if ((status & ZFCP_STATUS_PORT_PHYS_OPEN) &&
> (status & ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN))
> return zfcp_erp_port_forced_strategy_close(erp_action);
> @@ -933,7 +927,6 @@ static int zfcp_erp_port_strategy(struct zfcp_erp_action
> *erp_action)
>
> switch (erp_action->step) {
> case ZFCP_ERP_STEP_UNINITIALIZED:
> - zfcp_erp_port_strategy_clearstati(port);
> if (p_status & ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN)
> return zfcp_erp_port_strategy_close(erp_action);
> break;
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
> index 0fe8d5d..21ec5e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
> @@ -1396,8 +1396,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_open_port_handler(struct
> zfcp_fsf_req *req)
> port->handle = header->port_handle;
> atomic_set_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN |
> ZFCP_STATUS_PORT_PHYS_OPEN, &port->status);
> - atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_DENIED |
> - ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_BOXED,
> + atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_BOXED,
> &port->status);
> /* check whether D_ID has changed during open */
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
> index 672b572..6b66412 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
> @@ -73,9 +73,7 @@ ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR(zfcp_port, port, status, "0x%08x\n",
> ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR(zfcp_port, port, in_recovery, "%d\n",
> (atomic_read(&port->status) &
> ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ERP_INUSE) != 0);
> -ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR(zfcp_port, port, access_denied, "%d\n",
> - (atomic_read(&port->status) &
> - ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_DENIED) != 0);
> +ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR_CONST(port, access_denied, "%d\n", 0);
>
> ZFCP_DEFINE_ATTR(zfcp_unit, unit, status, "0x%08x\n",
> zfcp_unit_sdev_status(unit));
>
Is the ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_ACCESS_DENIED bit still in use somewhere?
If not, shouldn't it be removed altogether?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
