On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:28:52AM +0300, Dolev Raviv wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> This seem like a false alarm, please let me know if it requires a fix.
>
It may not indicate a bug, but it is correct in that the code could be
re-written:
Old:
else if ((req_link_state == UIC_LINK_OFF_STATE) &&
(!check_for_bkops || (check_for_bkops &&
!hba->auto_bkops_enabled))) {
Proposed:
else if ((req_link_state == UIC_LINK_OFF_STATE) &&
(!check_for_bkops || !hba->auto_bkops_enabled)) {
Those two are the same.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
