On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:10:30PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 09/29/2014 04:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:59:02PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> libata already uses an internal buffer, so we should be using
> >> __scsi_print_command() here.
> >>
> >> Cc: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: LKML <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de>
> > 
> > Applied to libata/for-3.18.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> Errm.
> Nice that you did, but it sort of relies for patches 01-32 to be
> applied previously.
> I'd rather apply your Signed-off-by: to the patch and have it
> routed through the SCSI tree; that way we're sure it'll only be
> applied if the previous patches are in.
> 
> Can you please pull it from libata to avoid build issues?

Ah, okay, pulled it.  Please feel free to add

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to