On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 15:57 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c
> @@ -1644,10 +1644,14 @@ static void srp_process_rsp(struct srp_target_port 
> *target, struct srp_rsp *rsp)
>                                    SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE));
>               }
 
Above this block, there is a line 
        if (rsp->flags & SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID) {

My thought was that you could wrap the code starting at that block and
ending after the additional scsi_set_resid() calls you added with an
outer test like so:

        if (unlikely(rsp->flags & ~SRP_RSP_FLAG_RSPVALID)) {
                if (rsp->flags & SRP_RSP_FLAG_SNSVALID) {
                        ...

instead of adding unlikely() to each test of flags. Once inside the
block -- which should be rare -- we're on the slow path anyway.

Your call.

> -             if (rsp->flags & (SRP_RSP_FLAG_DOOVER | SRP_RSP_FLAG_DOUNDER))
> -                     scsi_set_resid(scmnd, 
> be32_to_cpu(rsp->data_out_res_cnt));
> -             else if (rsp->flags & (SRP_RSP_FLAG_DIOVER | 
> SRP_RSP_FLAG_DIUNDER))
> +             if (unlikely(rsp->flags & SRP_RSP_FLAG_DIUNDER))
>                       scsi_set_resid(scmnd, 
> be32_to_cpu(rsp->data_in_res_cnt));
> +             else if (unlikely(rsp->flags & SRP_RSP_FLAG_DIOVER))
> +                     scsi_set_resid(scmnd, 
> -be32_to_cpu(rsp->data_in_res_cnt));
> +             else if (unlikely(rsp->flags & SRP_RSP_FLAG_DOUNDER))
> +                     scsi_set_resid(scmnd, 
> be32_to_cpu(rsp->data_out_res_cnt));
> +             else if (unlikely(rsp->flags & SRP_RSP_FLAG_DOOVER))
> +                     scsi_set_resid(scmnd, 
> -be32_to_cpu(rsp->data_out_res_cnt));
>  
>               srp_free_req(target, req, scmnd,
>                            be32_to_cpu(rsp->req_lim_delta));


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to