On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 05:19:57PM -0700, Adam Radford wrote:
>> James/linux-scsi,
>>
>> The following patch for megaraid_sas fixes the LD/VF affiliation policy 
>> parsing code to account for LD targetId's and Hidden LD's (not yet 
>> affiliated with any Virtual Functions).
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> this doesn't address Martins comment about removing the initial != 0
> case.  And while we're at it there basically is no significant shared
> code between the PlasmaFW111 and !PlasmaFW111, so split these into
> two different functions.  With those two levels of indentation removed
> the code might actually become readable, too.
>
> Also please remove the "James/linux-scsi," address in the individual
> patches, that's something that should just go into the cover letter,
> and make sure to include all "Reviewed-by:" and "Acked-by:" tags when
> resending already reviewd patches.
>
> Thanks,
>         Christoph

Christoph,

Thanks for your and Martin's feedback.

Actually there is a missing call to megasas_get_ld_vf_affiliation()
with initial = 1 that should be at the bottom of megasas_probe_one().
This got dropped inadvertently during a manual merge.  I will add that
and split the megasas_get_ld_vf_affiliation() function into 2
functions (as you suggested) and resubmit the patch series while
including all currently received "Reviewed-by" and "Acked-by" messages
for the other patches and dropping the "James/linux-scsi" text.

-Adam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to