From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn>

Fixes the following sparse warning:

drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c:573:1: warning:
 symbol 'sbc_check_prot' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
index 77d7ae2..ec49257 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ sbc_compare_and_write(struct se_cmd *cmd)
        return TCM_NO_SENSE;
 }
 
-bool
+static bool
 sbc_check_prot(struct se_device *dev, struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *cdb)
 {
        if (!dev->dev_attrib.pi_prot_type)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to