From: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>

the return codes from fcoe_rcv should be NET_RX_*, not 0 or -1.

Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.l...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
index f9b0302..134ca3b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
@@ -1546,13 +1546,13 @@ static int fcoe_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
net_device *netdev,
                wake_up_process(fps->thread);
        spin_unlock(&fps->fcoe_rx_list.lock);
 
-       return 0;
+       return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
 err:
        per_cpu_ptr(lport->stats, get_cpu())->ErrorFrames++;
        put_cpu();
 err2:
        kfree_skb(skb);
-       return -1;
+       return NET_RX_DROP;
 }
 
 /**

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to