> -----Original Message-----
> From: geert.uytterhoe...@gmail.com [mailto:geert.uytterhoe...@gmail.com]
> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 1:40 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Mike Christie; Jack Wang; Greg KH; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; oher...@suse.com; jbottom...@parallels.com;
> h...@infradead.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Drivers: scsi: FLUSH timeout
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:53 PM, KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I am not sure how that magic number was arrived at (the 60HZ number). We
> want this to be little higher -
>
> "60 * HZ" means "60 seconds".
>
> > would there be any issues raising this to say 180 seconds. This is the
> > value we
> currently have for I/O
> > timeout.
>
> So you want to replace it by "180 * HZ", which is ... another magic number?
Ideally, I want this to be adjustable like the way we can change the I/O
timeout.
Since that has been attempted earlier and rejected (not clear what the reasons
were),
I was suggesting that we pick a larger number. James, let me know how I should
proceed here.
Regards,
K. Y
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> ge...@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{���"�{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w���
���j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i
