On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih....@samsung.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 09, 2013 Santosh wrote:
>> > There are two patches remained. These are applied with your final comments.
>> > Do you have any idea?
>> > [PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: ufs: add dme configuration primitives
>> > [PATCH v4 6/6] scsi: ufs: add dme control primitives
>> >
>>
>> Since there is no use case for these implementations yet, except for
>> ufshcd_get_dme_attr_val(), as per James's suggestion
>> [http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg20207.html]
>> I did not ACK the patches.
>> The same patches can be used to implement related features and resubmit 
>> later.
> I respect your decision. But I have another opinion.
> The remained patches are basic operations which should be supported by ufshcd.
> Especially, dme_set/set will be used in vender specific part of host 
> controller rather than in ufshcd itself.
> And above all, Maya Erez completed to test and reported working fine.
> If these patches are merged this time, it would be helpful to various hosts.
>

I'm ok with merging these patches if James is fine with it. I will ACK
the patches.

-- 
~Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to