> Well, looking at QLogic and Emulex both emulate a bus reset with a > loop over each target and invoke a target reset there. > I somewhat fail to see the rationale behind it, other than emulating > the bus reset behaviour on SPI. > Given that the original target reset already failed (otherwise we > wouldn't be doing a bus reset), I doubt a _second_ target reset > will lead to a different result. > > So invoking REMOVE I_T NEXUS here can only improve matters :-) > > I'm all for renaming bus_reset, though :-) >
Since modern storage fabrics don't really have a "bus" to reset any more, a bolder approach of getting rid of bus_reset might be warranted.
