On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:07:01 -0600 "Chris Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2008 11:30 AM, Douglas Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alan Cox wrote: > > >> better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is > > >> way > > >> better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm biased for simple and > > >> low-level, and against those crazy SCSI people to begin with. > > > > > > Current ATAoE isn't. It can't support NCQ. A variant that did NCQ and IP > > > would probably trash iSCSI for latency if nothing else. > > > > And a variant that doesn't do ATA or IP: > > http://www.fcoe.com/ > > > > however, and interestingly enough, the open-fcoe software target > depends on scst (for now anyway) STGT also supports software FCoE target driver though it's still experimental stuff. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg12705.html It works in user space like STGT's iSCSI (and iSER) target driver (i.e. no kernel/user space interaction). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
