On Thu, Jan 10 2008 at 15:06 +0200, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 10 2008 at 14:33 +0200, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> could you explain to me why this code can get away with allocating the
>>> sense buffer on the stack?
>>>
>>> static int sg_io(struct file *file, struct request_queue *q,
>>> struct gendisk *bd_disk, struct sg_io_hdr *hdr)
>>> {
>>> unsigned long start_time;
>>> int writing = 0, ret = 0, has_write_perm = 0;
>>> struct request *rq;
>>> char sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE];
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Oliver
>>> -
>> where? what? do you mean in scsi_ioctl.c?
>> why not it's a synchronous call?
>> Do you mean 96 bytes is too big?
>> Do you mean DMA alignment and cache coherency? I'm working
>> on that for scsi devices.
>
> I'm guessing aligment - so the answer is that 'it cannot get away with
> it'.
>
I'm working on something for scsi.
Other block devices I don't know.
Boaz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
