On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:58:56 +1100
Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 20 December 2007 18:42:44 David Miller wrote:
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:06:31 +0900
> >
> > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:49:30 +1100
> > >
> > > Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * dma_map_sg_ring - Map an entire sg ring
> > > > + * @dev: Device to free noncoherent memory for
> > > > + * @sg: The sg_ring
> > > > + * @direction: DMA_TO_DEVICE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE or DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This returns -ENOMEM if mapping fails. It's not clear that telling
> > > > you + * it failed is useful though.
> > > > + */
> > > > +int dma_map_sg_ring(struct device *dev, struct sg_ring *sg,
> > > > + enum dma_data_direction direction)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct sg_ring *i;
> > > > + unsigned int num;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = sg; i; i = sg_ring_next(i, sg)) {
> > > > + BUG_ON(i->num > i->max);
> > > > + num = dma_map_sg(dev, i->sg, i->num, direction);
> > > > + if (num == 0 && i->num != 0)
> > > > + goto unmap;
> > > > + }
> > > > + return 0;
> > >
> > > I don't think that this works for IOMMUs that could merge sg entries.
> >
> > Right, it won't work at all.
> >
> > The caller has to be told how many DMA entries it really did use to
> > compose the mapping, and there has to be a way to properly iterate
> > over them. The assumption that the IOMMU will map the SG entries
> > 1-to-1 is invalid.
>
> Good catch. Indeed, what's missing is one line:
>
> i->num = num;
>
> Of course, an arch-specific version of this could merge between sg_rings,
> too, but that's an optimization.
We need to pass the whole sg entries to the IOMMUs at a time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
