Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +static void blk_rq_timed_out_timer(unsigned long data)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q = (struct request_queue *) data;
> + unsigned long flags, next = 0;
> + struct request *rq, *tmp;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(rq, tmp, &q->timeout_list, timeout_list) {
> + if (!next || time_before(next, rq->timeout))
> + next = rq->timeout;
> + if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rq->timeout)) {
> + list_del_init(&rq->timeout_list);
> + blk_rq_timed_out(rq);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (next)
> + mod_timer(&q->timeout, round_jiffies(next));
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
> +}
Is it possible that an rq->timeout could be zero, after all it is
jiffies? If so, the code may fail to schedule a timeout in such a case.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
