Am Freitag 28 September 2007 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > PS: Whoever designed klists is suffering from a case of overengineeringosis.
>
> No objection from me there. If you can think of a way to do list
> traversal without taking locks, please, feel free to redo the whole
> klist stuff.
No, I just was happy to be able to avoid using them.
But it is not just overengineered, it is also underengineered:
int bus_for_each_dev(struct bus_type * bus, struct device * start,
void * data, int (*fn)(struct device *, void *))
An interface should be designed to note where it fails, thus:
int bus_for_each_dev(struct bus_type * bus, struct device ** current,
void * data, int (*fn)(struct device *, void *))
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
