Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Moore, Eric wrote:
>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:32 AM,  James Bottomley  wrote:
>>  
>>>> Youve rejected the error recovery patchs, which is fair enough.  
>>> Just the separation ... the actual patch looks OK.
>>>
>>
>> I'll will continue working to separate the "error recovery
>> improvements:" into smaller feature add, but will take some time.   I
>> want some constructive feedback, and too big of patch is deterring some
>> people from looking at it.
> 
> I think it's fair to break it up, as long as its clearly noted that the
> patch is for review only.

Any chance the changes, properly documented, could be accepted as
one big patch?  Breaking this code into smaller patches, when it's
really intended as a driver update, could prove problematic.

Mike


> 
>     Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to