On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 16:05 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:03:40PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>  > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > ---
>  > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>  > index aebcd5f..7829ab1 100644
>  > --- a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>  > +++ b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>  > @@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ static int iscsi_tcp_get_addr(struct iscsi_conn 
> *conn, struct socket *sock,
>  >    struct sockaddr_in *sin;
>  >    int rc = 0, len;
>  >  
>  > -  addr = kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL, sizeof(*addr));
>  > +  addr = kmalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  >    if (!addr)
>  >            return -ENOMEM;
> 
> This seems like something that would be trivial to check for in checkpatch.

and at runtime if we make a __GFP_VALID flag we add to all GFP_'s (and
is just a few high bits in a specific pattern) and check that inside
kmalloc.. since kmalloc is inline just about always it's a constant and
thus compiled out check.. 
-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via 
http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to