On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 21:40 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote: > James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A proposal to display the correct form of the LUN would be useful if you > > wish to make it? ... The problem is really that SAM specifies a > > possible 4 level structure with 4 possible address methods per level. > > > > The well known LUNs should be simple; there are only three: Report Lun, > > Access Controls and Target Log Pages. The rest we really need input on. > > For instance, I could see the vendors wishing us to combine a > > multi-level flat addressing space into a single logical unit number, > > whereas I could see them wanting us to supply some sort of hierarchy for > > the peripheral and logical unit methods of addressing. > > > > Since you're already using 2 level flat addressing, how do you want to > > see that represented? > > James, why would we would not want to display the lun per SAM4 4.6.2 as > suggested by Stefan in a previous comment.
Because in a two LUN system, what was LUN 1 would then become LUN 0x1000000000000 which looks a bit unpalatable. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
