From: FUJITA Tomonori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 6/12/2007 7:51 PM To: Harrosh, Boaz Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: scsi_cmnd accessors issues > From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: scsi_cmnd accessors issues > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:02:20 +0300 > >> [2] >> if I use __deprecated on request_buffer, request_bufflen, and use_sg with >> scsi_sgtable implementation Than I get below list of files complaining: > >(snip) > >> and also these files from scsi-ml that need changing when implementation >> changes: >> drivers/scsi/scsi.c >> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c >> drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c >> >> (see: 0004-Convert-scsi-ml-to-use-of-new-scsi_sgtable.patch at scsi_cmnd.h) >> >> Which of the files do you have pending patches for? Which do you need that I >> send >> what I have for them? > >I don't think that SCSI-ml bidi will be got into 2.6.23. 2.6.23 will >convert as many LLDs as possible. I don't think that we need such >patches in scsi-misc or scsi-pending now. > >We need to agree on what the scsi bidi looks like first. When we add >bidi support to scsi core, we can change scsi core (scsi.c, etc) >together.
OK! But what about the _set_ accessors what are we doing with these? are we fixing the code or are we adding new _set_ accessors? Boaz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
